THE ARSCC
LIBRARIAN
WE LOVE THE ARSCC LIBRARIAN!
HOME

THE LIBRARIAN ARCHIVES:

13 September 2001:
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 1
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 2
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 3
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 4

22 August 2001:
Re: Attention Librarian


5 March 2001:
Re: Question for CL or Librarian


10 April 2000:
Part 1, 1972-1973 FIX AND REPOST
Part 1, 1972-1973 FIX AND REPOST (Continued)
Part 2, 1974-1975 FIX AND REPOST
Part 2, 1974-1975 FIX AND REPOST (Continued)
Part 3, 1976-A FIX AND REPOST
Part 4, 1976-B FIX AND REPOST
Part 5, 1977 FIX AND REPOST
Part 6, 1978 FIX AND REPOST
Part 7, 1979-1980 FIX AND REPOST
Part 8, 1981-1982 FIX AND REPOST
Re: Owen, We Have a Problem

3 March 2000:
Re Part 3, 1976-A

25 February 2000:
PGPed Where the heck have *I* been? From 1972 to 1982 and back!

17 January 1999:
THE LIBRARIAN AND THE LIVING DEAD

8 December 1998:
Re: Urgent to Veritas: Marie

18 November 1998:
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART II
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART III
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I—CORRECTED

8 October 1998:
A Message and Picture From The ARSCC Librarian

9 April 1998:
ZED'S "DEAR LIBRARIAN" LETTER

4 March 1998:
ZED, HONEY, I'VE GOT WHAT YOU NEED!
Re: The Missing Ten Months


13 January 1998:
THE LIBRARIAN LOSES IT WITH SHERIFF RON

5 January 1998:
Re: ENTHETA.NET archive: The Librarian
Re: Librarian: riddle me this.....

4 January 1998:
Re: Challenge to Critics and Scientologists Alike
LIBRARIAN CALLING JETA!

30 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN'S PRESENT TO LITIGANTS

29 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN HAS PRESENTS!
PRESENT TO BOOKBUYERS
PRESENT FOR WILLIAM BARWELL
PRESENT FOR RON'S AMIGO
PRESENT FOR JUSTIN

22 December 1997:
LOOK WHAT YOUR LITTLE OL' LIBRARIAN FOUND!

21 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN SAYS *NOT* RECOMMENDED READING!

19 December 1997:
jf05353-A THANK-YOU CARD FROM THE LIBRARIAN
ZED STRUGGLES WITH THE LIBRARIAN
SHERIFF RON INTERROGATES THE LIBRARIAN
THE SHERIFF COMES BACK FOR MORE
RE: ZED STRUGGLES WITH THE LIBRARIAN--NOT!
ZED AND THE SHERIFF GANG UP ON THE LIBRARIAN

17 December 1997:
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-1
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-2
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-3
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-4
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-5
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-6
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-7

15 December 1997:
Challenge to Critics and Scientologists Alike

11 December 1997:
Re: Scientology/IRS Connection


RELATED FILES:

Public Research Foundation Press Release: "HIDDEN TIES BETWEEN IRS AND SCIENTOLOGY REVEALED"

The CST LEGAL PAPERS series


PUBLIC NOTICE:
The files on this site were found in publically available usenet archives and are in the public domain.

13 April 2000:
CST Legal Papers 12 Mitchell Affidavit


Date: 13 Apr 2000 08:58:46 -0000
From: Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Legal Archives)
Subject: CST Legal Papers 12 Mitchell Affidavit
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Message-ID: <39B554D3DCF@127.0.0.1>

NOTES:

1. This is an Affidavit of Truth executed by Stephen Mitchell on 20
November 1997. The Affidavit was posted on the internet, date unknown.
Stephen Mitchell has recently filed an appeal in a libel suit against
the CORPORATION known as "Church of Spiritual Technology" (CST). CST
is referenced in this Affidavit.

2. The Affidavit was apparently written as a result of a letter or FAX
to Mitchell from attorney William M. Hart (of law firm Paul, Hastings,
Janofsky & Walker LLP), but names other interested parties, including
David Miscavige, Sherman Lenske, Lyman Spurlock, and Guillame LeSevre.

3. The Affidavit addresses differences in various versions of the book
"New Slant on Life," and demands a response to each and every
paragraph of the Affidavit, with the challenge: "Any statement of fact
contained hereinabove that is not contradicted by direct response,
sworn under penalty of perjury, shall stand as true and uncontested,"
going on to say that "...lack of said response, sworn under penalty of
perjury...shall constitute an estoppel in pais for every statement of
fact...hereinabove, and shall debar respondent from gainsaying or
denying the uncontested truth of any statement of fact...hereinabove."

4. Interesting note: Attorney Hart apparently put the actual Client
Numbers for his clients Religious Technology Center (RTC) and Bridge
Publications, Inc. (BPI) in his FAX/letter.

The document speaks for itself:

====================================================================

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH

William M. Hart, of the law firm Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
LLP, hereinafter "respondent."  And other interested parties, David
Miscavige, Chairman of the Board of Religious Technology Center;
Sherman Lenske, Special Director of Church of Spiritual Technology;
Lyman Spurlock, last known as President of Church of Spiritual
Technology; John Doe #1, Executive Director of Bridge Publications,
Inc.; and Guillaume LeSevre, Executive Director of Church of
Scientology International.

1. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that there are no fewer than two
separate and distinctly different editions of "A New Slant on
Life"--a.k.a. "Scientology A New Slant on Life," a.k.a. "Scientology:
A New Slant on Life," a.k.a. "A New Slant on Life / L. Ron
Hubbard"--and, further,

2. WHEREAS, the 1988 edition bears a separate and distinctly different
identifying ISBN from the 1965 edition, and, further,

3. WHEREAS, the 1988 edition bears no cite to the 1965 edition
copyright, and, further,

4. WHEREAS, the 1997 edition bears cite to the 1988 edition copyright
information, and bears an ISBN identical to the ISBN of the 1988
edition, and, further,

5. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that the "1965 edition of that
work...was written by Mr. Hubbard," and, further,

6. WHEREAS, the cover and dustjacket of the 1965 edition bear the
unequivocal statement, "by L. Ron Hubbard," and, further,

7. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that the 1988 edition is a "new
edition," as defined in the "Editor's Foreword" printed in that
edition, and, further,

8. WHEREAS, the 1988 "new edition" does not, anywhere, bear the
unequivocal statement, "by L. Ron Hubbard," and, further

9. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that the 1988 "new edition"
contains "new matter," and, further,

10. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that the 1988 new edition
"includes...text...by the Church of Scientology International," and,
further,

11. WHEREAS, the 1988 new edition contains text, other than the
editor's foreward, that is authored by persons other than L. Ron
Hubbard, and, further,

12. WHEREAS, certain text, other than the editor's foreword, in the
1988 new edition includes revisions to, and re-writes of, text taken
from L. Ron Hubbard's original 1965 edition, and, further,

13. WHEREAS, the revisions and re-writes established in [Paragraph] 12
hereinabove are in no way segregated from L. Ron Hubbard's original
1965 text, and are in no way identified or identifiable as to
authorship, but, indeed, would appear, to any reasonably prudent
person, to be an integral part of L. Ron Hubbard's original text, and,
further,

14. WHEREAS, those revisions and rewrites, as established in
[Paragraphs] 12 and 13 hereinabove were not written by L. Ron Hubbard,
and, further,

15. WHEREAS, the Library of Congress lists "Church of Scientology,
employer for hire" in the AUTH (author) datafield for the 1988 new
edition, and, further,

16. WHEREAS, the words "Church of Scientology" do not appear anywhere
on cover or dustjacket of the 1988 new edition, or the 1988-1997 new
edition, in any way that could be perceived or understood, by a
reasonbly prudent person, as representative of authorship, and,
further,

17. WHEREAS, the 1988 new edition, and the 1988-1997 new edition,
hereinafter "new editions," are absent eight (8) chapters which were
written by L. Ron Hubbard, and which appeared in the original 1965
edition, and, further,

18. WHEREAS, the new editions contain no mention of the eight (8)
missing chapters, and, further,

19. WHEREAS, neither of the new editions are identified anywhere on
covers or dustjackets as "revised editions,"  or "abridged editions,"
and, further,

20. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that the 1988 new edition was
prepared "based upon....L. Ron Hubbard writings," which is clearly and
inarguably not the same as being L. Ron Hubbard writings, and,
further,

21. WHEREAS, the Library of Congress does not list "L. Ron Hubbard" in
the AUTH (author) datafield for the 1988 new edition, and, further,

22. WHEREAS, respondent Hart concedes that "the name 'L. Ron Hubbard'
was incorporated into the title" in the actual certificates filed with
the U. S. Copyright Office for the 1988 new edition, and is not simply
a mistake in the abstracts, and, further,

23. WHEREAS, so incorporating the name "L. Ron Hubbard" into the title
enables "misrepresentations as to authorship," and, further,

24. WHEREAS, L. Ron Hubbard, in Hubbard Communications Office Policy
Letters, hereinafter "HCO PLs," specifically forbade any
misrepresentations as to authorship of his works, declaring, "The
field and public must not be led to believe that I have written or
issued things I have not," and, further,

25. WHEREAS, L. Ron Hubbard, the man and the author, did not issue the
new editions, which have text authored by unknown others, and which
have had eight (8) chapters removed, and, further,

26. WHEREAS, the Church of Scientology International, Bridge
Publications, Inc., and the Religious Technology Center are legally
bound to uphold and abide by HCO PLs, and, further,

27. WHEREAS, the words "L. Ron Hubbard" appear prominently on the
covers and dustjackets of the new editions in a position and size that
would be construed by any reasonably prudent person to represent sole
authorship by L. Ron Hubbard, and, further,

28. WHEREAS, the words "L. Ron Hubbard" and "Hubbard" are currently
registered trademarks under the control of Religious Technology
Center, hereinafter "RTC," and, further,

29. WHEREAS, respondent Hart--on a document dated November 14, 1997,
and identified as a FAX cover sheet, with the identifying number "No.
703 P001"--states CLIENT NAME to be RTC (Religious Technology Center),
and states CLIENT # to be 24437.00600, and, further,

30. WHEREAS, the publisher of the new editions of "A New Slant on
Life" is Bridge Publications, Inc., and, further,

31. WHEREAS, respondent Hart--on a document dated November 14, 1997,
and identified as the first page of a letter to Affiant, VIA
FACSIMILE, with the identifying number "No. 703 P002," and with
further identification as "FILE NO. 24437.00600," and headed, "Re: 'A
New Slant on Life'"--states, "This firm is intellectual property
litigation counsel to Bridge Publications, Inc.," and, further,

32. WHEREAS, both RTC and Bridge Publications, Inc. are indispensible
to, and are each and both principals in the advertising, and in the
final marketed presentation of the new editions of "A New Slant on
Life," and, further,

33. WHEREAS, respondent Hart represents himself as counsel to both
parties, and, further,

34. WHEREAS, the advertising and the final marketed presentation of
the new editions of "A New Slant on Life" would lead any reasonably
prudent person to believe that L. Ron Hubbard was the sole author,
and, further,

35. WHEREAS, the new editions are edited, abridged, and revised, and,
further,

36. WHEREAS, the words "edited," "abridged," or "revised" are present
nowhere in the advertising, marketing, or outward presentation of the
new editions, and, further,

37. WHEREAS, the trademark "L. Ron Hubbard" is featured prominently on
the covers and dustjackets of the new editions in a place and manner
most likely to lead any reasonably prudent person to believe that L.
Ron Hubbard was the sole author, and, further,

38. WHEREAS, the Church of Spiritual Technology, is, by assignment,
the current holder of the copyrights to the new editions, and,
further,

39. WHEREAS, the Church of Scientology International, the Religious
Technology Center, the Church of Spiritual Technology, and Bridge
Publications, Inc. have all had, at all relevant times, implied and
actual notice of all the foregoing, and, further,

40. WHEREAS, neither Church of Scientology International, Religious
Technology Center,  Church of Spiritual Technology, nor Bridge
Publications, Inc., have taken any action to correct or rectify any of
the foregoing, and, further,

41. WHEREAS, respondent Hart, representing, as counsel, both RTC and
BPI, has characterized the foregoing as "baseless allegations," even
while conceding many of the points contained hereinabove, and,
further,

42. WHEREAS, respondent Hart, representing, as counsel, both RTC and
BPI, has issued threats to the Affiant of "substantial legal
consequences" for the dissemination of the incontrovertible facts
contained hereinabove, and, further,

43. WHEREAS, Affiant avers that all the foregoing is true and accurate
to the best of his knowledge and belief,

THEREFORE,

44. Notice is hereby given that Affiant demands a response within ten
(10) days, from respondent, sworn under penalty of perjury, to each
and every statement of fact in [Paragraphs] 1 through 43 hereinabove.
A response, sworn under penalty of perjury, that contradicts any one
of the statements of fact in any of [Paragraphs] 1 through 43
hereinabove shall have no bearing on any other statement of fact
contained in any other [Paragraph] hereinabove. Any statement of fact
contained hereinabove that is not contradicted by direct response,
sworn under penalty of perjury, shall stand as true and uncontested.

45. Notice is hereby given that lack of said response, sworn under
penalty of perjury, by respondent shall be construed as willful bad
faith on the part of respondent in regard to all matters referenced in
[Paragraphs] 1 through 43 hereinabove.

46. Notice is hereby given that lack of said response, sworn under
penalty of perjury, by respondent shall constitute an estoppel in pais
for every statement of fact in [Paragraphs] 1 through 43 hereinabove,
and shall debar respondent from gainsaying or denying the uncontested
truth of any statement of fact in [Paragraphs] 1 through 43
hereinabove.

47. Affiant specifically reserves to himself his sovereign and
inalienable rights to communicate the incontroverted facts contained
in [Paragraphs] 1 through 43 hereinabove to anyone of his choosing,
including any person whose life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness may
be adversely affected by an unawareness of the facts contained in
[Paragraphs] 1 through 43 hereinabove, and reserves to himself all
rights and remedies that are his under God and under law, whether
express or implied.

Further, Affiant Saith Not.

Subscribed and sworn to this 20th day of November in the year 1997

       (Signature of Stephen Mitchell)
[L.S.}__________________________________SEAL
        My Hand and Mark as Subscriber

California state    )
                    )ss.
Los Angeles county  )

On this 20th day of November 1997, before me, Trisha Welsh, Notary
Public, personally appeared Stephen Mitchell personally known to me or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the man whose
name is subscribed within the instrument, and Stephen Mitchell
acknowledged to me that he executed the same and that by his mark and
seal on the instrument, Stephen Mitchell executed the instrument.

Purpose of Notary Public is for administering oath and/or
identification and cannot be construed as representing any entrance
into a foreign jurisdiction.

(Signature--Trisha Welsh)
________________________________________
Notary Public


EARLIER CST LEGAL PAPER  |  BACK  |  HOME  |  TOP  |  NEXT CST LEGAL PAPER

1