THE ARSCC
LIBRARIAN
WE LOVE THE ARSCC LIBRARIAN!
HOME

THE LIBRARIAN ARCHIVES:

13 September 2001:
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 1
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 2
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 3
YOO-HOO! PTSC! About those copyrights PART 4

22 August 2001:
Re: Attention Librarian


5 March 2001:
Re: Question for CL or Librarian


10 April 2000:
Part 1, 1972-1973 FIX AND REPOST
Part 1, 1972-1973 FIX AND REPOST (Continued)
Part 2, 1974-1975 FIX AND REPOST
Part 2, 1974-1975 FIX AND REPOST (Continued)
Part 3, 1976-A FIX AND REPOST
Part 4, 1976-B FIX AND REPOST
Part 5, 1977 FIX AND REPOST
Part 6, 1978 FIX AND REPOST
Part 7, 1979-1980 FIX AND REPOST
Part 8, 1981-1982 FIX AND REPOST
Re: Owen, We Have a Problem

3 March 2000:
Re Part 3, 1976-A

25 February 2000:
PGPed Where the heck have *I* been? From 1972 to 1982 and back!

17 January 1999:
THE LIBRARIAN AND THE LIVING DEAD

8 December 1998:
Re: Urgent to Veritas: Marie

18 November 1998:
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART II
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART III
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I—CORRECTED

8 October 1998:
A Message and Picture From The ARSCC Librarian

9 April 1998:
ZED'S "DEAR LIBRARIAN" LETTER

4 March 1998:
ZED, HONEY, I'VE GOT WHAT YOU NEED!
Re: The Missing Ten Months


13 January 1998:
THE LIBRARIAN LOSES IT WITH SHERIFF RON

5 January 1998:
Re: ENTHETA.NET archive: The Librarian
Re: Librarian: riddle me this.....

4 January 1998:
Re: Challenge to Critics and Scientologists Alike
LIBRARIAN CALLING JETA!

30 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN'S PRESENT TO LITIGANTS

29 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN HAS PRESENTS!
PRESENT TO BOOKBUYERS
PRESENT FOR WILLIAM BARWELL
PRESENT FOR RON'S AMIGO
PRESENT FOR JUSTIN

22 December 1997:
LOOK WHAT YOUR LITTLE OL' LIBRARIAN FOUND!

21 December 1997:
THE LIBRARIAN SAYS *NOT* RECOMMENDED READING!

19 December 1997:
jf05353-A THANK-YOU CARD FROM THE LIBRARIAN
ZED STRUGGLES WITH THE LIBRARIAN
SHERIFF RON INTERROGATES THE LIBRARIAN
THE SHERIFF COMES BACK FOR MORE
RE: ZED STRUGGLES WITH THE LIBRARIAN--NOT!
ZED AND THE SHERIFF GANG UP ON THE LIBRARIAN

17 December 1997:
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-1
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-2
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-3
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-4
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-5
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-6
ZED VS. THE LIBRARIAN-7

15 December 1997:
Challenge to Critics and Scientologists Alike

11 December 1997:
Re: Scientology/IRS Connection


RELATED FILES:

Public Research Foundation Press Release: "HIDDEN TIES BETWEEN IRS AND SCIENTOLOGY REVEALED"

The CST LEGAL PAPERS series


PUBLIC NOTICE:
The files on this site were found in publically available usenet archives and are in the public domain.

18 November 1998:
LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I— CORRECTION

The Librarian issues a brief and red-faced correction to LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I, where she had mistakenly said the series was four parts instead of three. LIBRARIAN TRIVIA: This is the last post by The Librarian that isn't PGP-signed. (Except a few times when she forgot, and usually corrected. PGP is "Pretty Good Privacy," an encryption utility.) The reason she started PGP-signing is that there was, around this time, a sudden rash of attempted forgeries of The Librarian, as is explained in her next message.:


From: librarian@arscc.chimerical.library (The Librarian)
Subject: LIEBERMAN AND THE LIBRARIAN, PART I--CORRECTION
Date: 1998/11/18
Message-ID: <199811182249.XAA07940@replay.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology


I am, like, *so* embarrassed I could just as-*is*!

I was so tired when I finished the THREE-part "LIEBERMAN AND THE
LIBRARIAN" series, that I missed this *total* goof. In "LIEBERMAN AND
THE LIBRARIAN, PART I," I wrote:

>WARNING: I did little summaries, excerpts, or abstracts of the
>articles--depending on how much there was about Lieberman in
>each one--but the whole thing is *still* longer than a stood-up
>stallion. (I put in references to the actual articles, so you
>can look them up on Nexus or in your local library.) But,
>anyways, because this is so-o-o-o-o-o long, I am having to break
>it into FOUR parts. My remailer wouldn't send the whole thing at
>once even if I wanted to. That's why you'll need to get all
>four parts.

Well, that was when I thought it would have to be FOUR parts, and
then, after I wrote that, I managed to squeeze it into THREE parts.

And then I didn't go back and CORRECT where I had written FOUR!

Du-u-u-uh!

<Tsk!> I am *definitely* going to try blonde next summer. In the
meantime, somebody is just going to *have* to spank me.

Anywa-a-a-a-ays. There are only THREE parts. Sorry.

                          --<The ARSCC Librarian>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
*The ARSCC, like its penitent little Librarian, does not exist.



EARLIER MESSAGE  |  BACK  |  HOME  |  TOP  |  NEXT MESSAGE

1